Lorentz force

 ( Physical Phenomena ) 

In electromagnetism, the Lorentz force is the force exerted on a charged particle by Electric field and . It determines how charged particles move in electromagnetic environments and underlies many physical phenomena, from the operation of and particle accelerators to the behavior of plasmas.

The Lorentz force has two components. The electric force acts in the direction of the electric field for positive charges and opposite to it for negative charges, tending to accelerate the particle in a straight line. The magnetic force is perpendicular to both the particle's velocity and the magnetic field, and it causes the particle to move along a curved trajectory, often circular or helical in form, depending on the directions of the fields.

Variations on the force law describe the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire (sometimes called Laplace force), and the electromotive force in a wire loop moving through a magnetic field, as described by Faraday's law of induction.

Together with Maxwell's equations, which describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated by charges and currents, the Lorentz force law forms the foundation of classical electrodynamics. While the law remains valid in special relativity, it breaks down at small scales where quantum effects become important. In particular, the intrinsic spin of particles gives rise to additional interactions with electromagnetic fields that are not accounted for by the Lorentz force.

Historians suggest that the law is implicit in a paper by James Clerk Maxwell, published in 1865. Hendrik Lorentz arrived at a complete derivation in 1895, identifying the contribution of the electric force a few years after Oliver Heaviside correctly identified the contribution of the magnetic force.

---

Definition and properties

---

Point particle The Lorentz force acting on a point particle with electric charge , moving with velocity , due to an external electric field and magnetic field , is given by (SI definition of quantities):

Here, is the vector cross product, and all quantities in bold are vectors. In component form, the force is written as:

In general, the electric and magnetic fields depend on both position and time. As a charged particle moves through space, the force acting on it at any given moment depends on its current location, velocity, and the instantaneous values of the fields at that location. Therefore, explicitly, the Lorentz force can be written as: $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{r\}(t),\backslash dot\backslash mathbf\{r\}(t),t,q\backslash right)\; =\; q\backslash left\backslash mathbf\{E\}(\backslash mathbf\{r\},t)$$ in which is the position vector of the charged particle, is time, and the overdot is a time derivative.

The total electromagnetic force consists of two parts: the electric force , which acts in the direction of the electric field and accelerates the particle linearly, and the magnetic force , which acts perpendicularly to both the velocity and the magnetic field. Some sources refer to the Lorentz force as the sum of both components, while others use the term to refer to the magnetic part alone.For example, see the website of the Lorentz Institute.

The direction of the magnetic force is often determined using the right-hand rule: if the index finger points in the direction of the velocity, and the middle finger points in the direction of the magnetic field, then the thumb points in the direction of the force (for a positive charge). In a uniform magnetic field, this results in circular or helical trajectories, known as cyclotron motion.

In many practical situations, such as the motion of or in a plasma, the effect of a magnetic field can be approximated as a superposition of two components: a relatively fast circular motion around a point called the guiding center, and a relatively slow drift of this point. The drift speeds may differ for various species depending on their charge states, masses, or temperatures. These differences may lead to electric currents or chemical separation.

While the magnetic force affects the direction of a particle's motion, it does no mechanical work on the particle. The rate at which the energy is transferred from the electromagnetic field to the particle is given by the dot product of the particle's velocity and the force: $$\backslash mathbf\{v\}\backslash cdot\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; q\backslash mathbf\{v\}\backslash cdot(\backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\})\; =\; q\; \backslash ,\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}.$$Here, the magnetic term vanishes because a vector is always perpendicular to its cross product with another vector; the scalar triple product $\backslash mathbf\{v\}\backslash cdot\; (\backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\})$ is zero. Thus, only the electric field can transfer energy to or from a particle and change its kinetic energy.

Some textbooks use the Lorentz force law as the fundamental definition of the electric and magnetic fields.

That is, the fields and are uniquely defined at each point in space and time by the hypothetical force a test particle of charge and velocity would experience there, even if no charge is present. This definition remains valid even for particles approaching the speed of light (that is, magnitude of , ).

(1990). 9780471927129, John Wiley & Sons. . ISBN 9780471927129

However, some argue that using the Lorentz force law as the definition of the electric and magnetic fields is not necessarily the most fundamental approach possible.

---

Continuous charge distribution The Lorentz force law also given in terms of continuous charge distributions, such as those found in conductors or plasmas. For a small element of a moving charge distribution with charge $\backslash mathrm\{d\}q$, the infinitesimal force is given by: $$\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; \backslash mathrm\{d\}q\backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\backslash right)$$ Dividing both sides by the volume $\backslash mathrm\{d\}V$ of the charge element gives the force density $$\backslash mathbf\{f\}\; =\; \backslash rho\backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\backslash right),$$ where $\backslash rho$ is the charge density and $\backslash mathbf\{f\}$ is the force per unit volume. Introducing the current density $\backslash mathbf\{J\}\; =\; \backslash rho\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}$, this can be rewritten as:

The total force is the volume integral over the charge distribution: $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; \backslash int\; \backslash left\; (\; \backslash rho\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{J\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; \backslash right)\backslash mathrm\{d\}V.$$

Using Maxwell's equations and vector calculus identities, the force density can be reformulated to eliminate explicit reference to the charge and current densities. The force density can then be written in terms of the electromagnetic fields and their derivatives:$$\backslash mathbf\{f\}\; =\; \backslash nabla\backslash cdot\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash sigma\}\; -\; \backslash dfrac\{1\}\{c^2\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\; \backslash mathbf\{S\}\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}$$ where $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash sigma\}$ is the Maxwell stress tensor, $\backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot$ denotes the tensor divergence, $c$ is the speed of light, and $\backslash mathbf\{S\}$ is the Poynting vector. This form of the force law relates the energy flux in the fields to the force exerted on a charge distribution. (See Covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism for more details.)

The power density corresponding to the Lorentz force, the rate of energy transfer to the material, is given by:$$\backslash mathbf\{J\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}.$$

Inside a material, the total charge and current densities can be separated into free and bound parts. In terms of free charge density $\backslash rho\_\{\backslash rm\; f\}$, free current density $\backslash mathbf\{J\}\_\{\backslash rm\; f\}$, polarization $\backslash mathbf\{P\}$, and magnetization $\backslash mathbf\{M\}$, the force density becomes $$\backslash mathbf\{f\}\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash rho\_\{\backslash rm\; f\}\; -\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\; P\backslash right)\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{J\}\_\; +\; \backslash nabla\backslash times\backslash mathbf\{M\}\; +\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\backslash mathbf\{P\}\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}\backslash right)\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}.$$This form accounts for the torque applied to a permanent magnet by the magnetic field. The associated power density is $$\backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{J\}\_f\; +\; \backslash nabla\backslash times\backslash mathbf\{M\}\; +\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\backslash mathbf\{P\}\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}\backslash right)\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}.$$

---

Formulation in the Gaussian system The above-mentioned formulae use the conventions for the definition of the electric and magnetic field used with the SI, which is the most common. However, other conventions with the same physics (i.e. forces on e.g. an electron) are possible and used. In the conventions used with the older Gaussian units, which are somewhat more common among some theoretical physicists as well as condensed matter experimentalists, one has instead $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; q\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\; \backslash left(\backslash mathbf\{E\}\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\; +\; \backslash frac\{\backslash mathbf\{v\}\}\{c\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\backslash right),$$ where is the speed of light. Although this equation looks slightly different, it is equivalent, since one has the following relations: $$q\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{q\_\backslash mathrm\{SI\}\}\{\backslash sqrt\{4\backslash pi\; \backslash varepsilon\_0\}\},\backslash quad\; \backslash mathbf\; E\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{4\backslash pi\backslash varepsilon\_0\}\backslash ,\backslash mathbf\; E\_\backslash mathrm\{SI\},\backslash quad\; \backslash mathbf\; B\_\backslash mathrm\{G\}\; =\; \{\backslash sqrt\{4\backslash pi\; /\backslash mu\_0\}\}\backslash ,\{\backslash mathbf\; B\_\backslash mathrm\{SI\}\},\; \backslash quad\; c\; =\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{\backslash sqrt\{\backslash varepsilon\_0\; \backslash mu\_0\}\}.$$ where is the vacuum permittivity and the vacuum permeability. In practice, the subscripts "G" and "SI" are omitted, and the used convention (and unit) must be determined from context.

---

Force on a current-carrying wire When a wire carrying a steady electric current is placed in an external magnetic field, each of the moving charges in the wire experience the Lorentz force. Together, these forces produce a net macroscopic force on the wire. For a straight, stationary wire in a uniform magnetic field, this force is given by: $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; I\; \backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash ell\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; ,$$ where is the current and is a vector whose magnitude is the length of the wire, and whose direction is along the wire, aligned with the direction of the current.

If the wire is not straight or the magnetic field is non-uniform, the total force can be computed by applying the formula to each infinitesimal segment of wire $\backslash mathrm\; d\; \backslash boldsymbol\; \backslash ell$, then adding up all these forces by integration. In this case, the net force on a stationary wire carrying a steady current is $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; I\backslash int\; (\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash ell\}\backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}).$$

One application of this is Ampère's force law, which describes the attraction or repulsion between two current-carrying wires. Each wire generates a magnetic field, described by the Biot–Savart law, which exerts a Lorentz force on the other wire. If the currents flow in the same direction, the wires attract; if the currents flow in opposite directions, they repel. This interaction provided the basis of the former definition of the ampere, as the constant current that produces a force of 2 × 10^-7 newtons per metre between two straight, parallel wires one metre apart.

Another application is an induction motor. The stator winding AC current generates a moving magnetic field which induces a current in the rotor. The subsequent Lorentz force $\backslash mathbf\{F\}$ acting on the rotor creates a torque, making the motor spin. Hence, though the Lorentz force law does not apply when the magnetic field $\backslash mathbf\{B\}$ is generated by the current $I$, it does apply when the current $I$ is induced by the movement of magnetic field $\backslash mathbf\{B\}$.

---

Electromagnetic induction The Lorentz force acting on electric charges in a conducting loop can produce a current by pushing charges around the circuit. This effect is the fundamental mechanism underlying induction motors and generators. It is described in terms of electromotive force (emf), a quantity which plays a central role in the theory of electromagnetic induction. In a simple circuit with resistance $R$, an emf $\backslash mathcal\; E$ gives rise to a current $I$ according to the Ohm's law $\backslash mathcal\; E\; =\; IR$.

Both components of the Lorentz force—the electric and the magnetic—can contribute to the emf in a circuit, but through different mechanisms. In both cases, the induced emf is described by Faraday's flux rule, which states that the emf around a closed loop is equal to the negative rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop: $$\backslash mathcal\{E\}\; =\; -\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash Phi\_B\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}.$$The magnetic flux $\backslash Phi\_B$ is defined as the surface integral of the magnetic field B over a surface Σ(t) bounded by the loop: $$\backslash Phi\_B\; =\; \backslash int\_\{\backslash Sigma\}\; \backslash mathbf\; B\backslash cdot\; \{\backslash rm\; d\}\backslash mathbf\; S$$ The flux can change either because the loop moves or deforms over time, or because the field itself varies in time. These two possibilities correspond to the two mechanisms described by the flux rule:

• Motional emf: The circuit moves through a static but non-uniform magnetic field.
• Transformer emf: The circuit remains stationary while the magnetic field changes over time

The sign of the induced emf is given by Lenz's law, which states that the induced current produces a magnetic field opposing the change in the original flux.

The flux rule can be derived from the Maxwell–Faraday equation and the Lorentz force law. In some cases, especially in extended systems, the flux rule may be difficult to apply directly or may not provide a complete description, and the full Lorentz force law must be used. (See inapplicability of Faraday's law.)

---

Motional emf The basic mechanism behind motional emf is illustrated by a conducting rod moving through a magnetic field that is perpendicular to both the rod and its direction of motion. Due to movement in magnetic field, the mobile electrons of the conductor experience the magnetic component () of the Lorentz force that drives them along the length of the rod. This leads to a separation of charge between the two ends of the rod. In the steady state, the electric field from the accumulated charge balances the magnetic force. the rod is part of a closed conducting loop moving through a nonuniform magnetic field, the same effect can drive a current around the circuit. For instance, suppose the magnetic field is confined to a limited region of space, and the loop initially lies outside this region. As it moves into the field, the area of the loop that encloses magnetic flux increases, and an emf is induced. From the Lorentz force perspective, this is because the field exerts a magnetic force on charge carriers in the parts of the loop entering the region. Once the entire loop lies in a uniform magnetic field and continues at constant speed, the total enclosed flux remains constant, and the emf vanishes. In this situation, magnetic forces on opposite sides of the loop cancel out.

---

Transformer emf A complementary case is transformer emf, which occurs when the conducting loop remains stationary but the magnetic flux through it changes due to a time-varying magnetic field. This can happen in two ways: either the source of the magnetic field moves, altering the field distribution through the fixed loop, or the strength of the magnetic field changes over time at a fixed location, as in the case of a powered electromagnet..

In either situation, no magnetic force acts on the charges, and the emf is entirely due to the electric component () of the Lorentz force. According to the Maxwell–Faraday equation, a time-varying magnetic field produces a circulating electric field, which drives current in the loop. This phenomenon underlies the operation of electrical machines such as synchronous generators. The electric field induced in this way is non-conservative, meaning its line integral around a closed loop is not zero.

---

Relativity From the viewpoint of special relativity, the distinction between motional and transformer emf is frame-dependent. In the laboratory frame, a moving loop in a static field generates emf via magnetic forces. But in a frame moving with the loop, the magnetic field appears time-dependent, and the emf arises from an induced electric field. Einstein's special theory of relativity was partially motivated by the desire to better understand this link between the two effects. In modern terms, electric and magnetic fields are different components of a single electromagnetic field tensor, and a transformation between inertial frames mixes the two.

Tai L. Chow (2025). 9780763738273, Jones and Bartlett. . ISBN 9780763738273

---

History Early attempts to quantitatively describe the electromagnetic force were made in the mid-18th century. It was proposed that the force on magnetic poles, by Johann Tobias Mayer and others in 1760,

Michel Delon (2025). 157958246X, Fitzroy Dearborn. 157958246X

and electrically charged objects, by Henry Cavendish in 1762,

Elliot H. Goodwin (1965). 9780521045469, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521045469

obeyed an inverse-square law. However, in both cases the experimental proof was neither complete nor conclusive. It was not until 1784 when Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, using a torsion balance, was able to definitively show through experiment that this was true.

Herbert W. Meyer (1972). 026213070X, Burndy Library. . 026213070X

Soon after the discovery in 1820 by Hans Christian Ørsted that a magnetic needle is acted on by a voltaic current, André-Marie Ampère that same year was able to devise through experimentation the formula for the angular dependence of the force between two current elements.

Gerrit L. Verschuur (1993). 9780195064889, Oxford University Press. . ISBN 9780195064889

In all these descriptions, the force was always described in terms of the properties of the matter involved and the distances between two masses or charges rather than in terms of electric and magnetic fields.

Gerrit L. Verschuur (1993). 9780195064889, Oxford University Press. . ISBN 9780195064889

The modern concept of electric and magnetic fields first arose in the theories of Michael Faraday, particularly his idea of lines of force, later to be given full mathematical description by Lord Kelvin and James Clerk Maxwell. From a modern perspective it is possible to identify in Maxwell's 1865 formulation of his field equations a form of the Lorentz force equation in relation to electric currents, although in the time of Maxwell it was not evident how his equations related to the forces on moving charged objects. J. J. Thomson was the first to attempt to derive from Maxwell's field equations the electromagnetic forces on a moving charged object in terms of the object's properties and external fields. Interested in determining the electromagnetic behavior of the charged particles in , Thomson published a paper in 1881 wherein he gave the force on the particles due to an external magnetic field as $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{q\}\{2\}\backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}.$$ Thomson derived the correct basic form of the formula, but, because of some miscalculations and an incomplete description of the displacement current, included an incorrect scale-factor of a half in front of the formula. Oliver Heaviside invented the modern vector notation and applied it to Maxwell's field equations; he also (in 1885 and 1889) had fixed the mistakes of Thomson's derivation and arrived at the correct form of the magnetic force on a moving charged object. Finally, in 1895, Hendrik Lorentz derived the modern form of the formula for the electromagnetic force which includes the contributions to the total force from both the electric and the magnetic fields. Lorentz began by abandoning the Maxwellian descriptions of the ether and conduction. Instead, Lorentz made a distinction between matter and the luminiferous aether and sought to apply the Maxwell equations at a microscopic scale. Using Heaviside's version of the Maxwell equations for a stationary ether and applying Lagrangian mechanics (see below), Lorentz arrived at the correct and complete form of the force law that now bears his name.

---

Lorentz force in terms of potentials The and fields can be replaced by the magnetic vector potential and (scalar) electrostatic potential by $$\backslash begin\{align\}$$

\mathbf{E} &= - \nabla \phi - \frac { \partial \mathbf{A} } { \partial t } \\[1ex]
\mathbf{B} &= \nabla \times \mathbf{A}
     

\end{align} where is the gradient, is the divergence, and is the curl.

The force becomes $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; q\backslash left-\backslash nabla.$$

Using an identity for the triple product this can be rewritten as $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; q\backslash left-\backslash nabla.$$

(Notice that the coordinates and the velocity components should be treated as independent variables, so the del operator acts only on not on thus, there is no need of using Feynman's subscript notation in the equation above.) Using the chain rule, the convective derivative of $\backslash mathbf\{A\}$ is:

$$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash mathbf\{A\}\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\backslash mathbf\{A\}\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}+(\backslash mathbf\{v\}\backslash cdot\backslash nabla)\backslash mathbf\{A\}$$ so that the above expression becomes: $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}\; =\; q\backslash left-\backslash nabla.$$

With and $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\backslash left\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; =\; -\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash mathbf\{A\}\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\},$$ we can put the equation into the convenient Euler–Lagrange form

where $$\backslash nabla\_\{\backslash mathbf\{x\}\; \}\; =\; \backslash hat\{x\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\; +\; \backslash hat\{y\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; y\}\; +\; \backslash hat\{z\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; z\}$$ and $$\backslash nabla\_\{\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{x\}\; \}\; \}\; =\; \backslash hat\{x\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash dot\{x\}\; \}\; +\; \backslash hat\{y\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash dot\{y\}\; \}\; +\; \backslash hat\{z\}\; \backslash dfrac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash dot\{z\}\; \}.$$

---

Lorentz force and analytical mechanics The Lagrangian for a charged particle of mass and charge in an electromagnetic field equivalently describes the dynamics of the particle in terms of its energy, rather than the force exerted on it. The classical expression is given by:

T. W. B. Kibble (2025). 9781860944246, World Scientific Publishing Company. ISBN 9781860944246

$$L\; =\; \backslash frac\{m\}\{2\}\; \backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\; \}\backslash cdot\backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\; \}\; +\; q\; \backslash mathbf\{A\}\backslash cdot\backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\; \}-q\backslash phi$$ where and are the potential fields as above. The quantity $V\; =\; q(\backslash phi\; -\; \backslash mathbf\{A\}\backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\})$ can be identified as a generalized, velocity-dependent potential energy and, accordingly, $\backslash mathbf\{F\}$ as a non-conservative force. Using the Lagrangian, the equation for the Lorentz force given above can be obtained again.

The Hamiltonian can be derived from the Lagrangian using a Legendre transformation. The canonical momentum is $$p\_i\; =\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash dot\; r\_i\}\; =\; m\backslash dot\{r\}\_i\; +\; q\; A\_i(\backslash mathbf\; r).$$ Applying the Legendre transformation gives $$H\; =\; \backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\; r\}\backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\; p\; -\; L\; =\; \backslash frac\{\backslash mathbf^2\}\{2m\}\; +\; q\backslash phi.$$This classical Hamiltonian directly generalizes to quantum mechanics, where $\backslash mathbf\; p$ and $\backslash mathbf\; r$ become non-commuting operators.

. For a ϕ field, the particle's potential energy is $q\backslash phi(\backslash mathbf\{r\},t)$.

The total potential energy is then: $$V\; =\; q\backslash phi\; -\; q\backslash mathbf\{A\}\backslash cdot\backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\}$$ and the kinetic energy is: $$T\; =\; \backslash frac\{m\}\{2\}\; \backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\}\backslash cdot\backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\}$$ hence the Lagrangian:

Lagrange's equations are $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash dot\{x\}\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}$$ (same for and ). So calculating the partial derivatives: $$\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}=\; -q\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; \backslash phi\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}+\; q\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{x\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_y\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{y\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_z\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{z\}\backslash right)$$ equating and simplifying: $$m\backslash ddot\{x\}+\; q\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{x\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; y\}\backslash dot\{y\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; z\}\backslash dot\{z\}\backslash right)=\; -q\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; \backslash phi\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}+\; q\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_x\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{x\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_y\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{y\}+\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; A\_z\}\{\backslash partial\; x\}\backslash dot\{z\}\backslash right)$$ and similarly for the and directions. Hence the force equation is: $$\backslash mathbf\{F\}=\; q(\backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{\backslash dot\{r\}\}\backslash times\backslash mathbf\{B\})$$

The relativistic Lagrangian is $$L\; =\; -mc^2\backslash sqrt\{1-\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \}\; \}\{c\}\backslash right)^2\}\; +\; q\; \backslash mathbf\{A\}(\backslash mathbf\{r\})\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \}\; -\; q\; \backslash phi(\backslash mathbf\{r\})$$

The action is the relativistic arclength of the path of the particle in spacetime, minus the potential energy contribution, plus an extra contribution which quantum mechanically is an extra phase a charged particle gets when it is moving along a vector potential.

{\mathrm{d}t} =\frac{\partial L}{\partial \mathbf{r}} = q {\partial \mathbf{A} \over \partial \mathbf{r}}\cdot \dot{\mathbf{r}} - q {\partial \phi \over \partial \mathbf{r} } $$\backslash mathbf\{P\}\; -q\backslash mathbf\{A\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{m\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\}\}\{\backslash sqrt\{1-\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\}\}\{c\}\backslash right)^2\}\}$$ are the same as Hamilton's equations of motion: $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash mathbf\{p\}\; \}\; \backslash left\; (\; \backslash sqrt\{(\backslash mathbf\{P\}-q\backslash mathbf\{A\})^2\; +\; (mc^2)^2\}\; +\; q\backslash phi\; \backslash right\; )$$ $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\backslash mathbf\{p\}\; \}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\; =\; -\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash mathbf\{r\}\}\; \backslash left\; (\; \backslash sqrt\{(\backslash mathbf\{P\}-q\backslash mathbf\{A\})^2\; +\; (mc^2)^2\}\; +\; q\backslash phi\; \backslash right\; )$$ both are equivalent to the noncanonical form: $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}t\}\; \{m\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \}\; \backslash over\; \backslash sqrt\{1-\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash dot\{\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \}\; \}\{c\}\backslash right)^2\}\; \}\; =\; q\backslash left\; (\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash dot\backslash mathbf\{r\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; \backslash right\; )\; .$$ This formula is the Lorentz force, representing the rate at which the EM field adds relativistic momentum to the particle.

---

Relativistic form of the Lorentz force

---

Covariant form of the Lorentz force

---

Field tensor Using the metric signature , the Lorentz force for a charge can be written in covariant form:

where is the four-momentum, defined as $$p^\backslash alpha\; =\; \backslash left(p\_0,\; p\_1,\; p\_2,\; p\_3\; \backslash right)\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash gamma\; m\; c,\; p\_x,\; p\_y,\; p\_z\; \backslash right)\; ,$$

the [[proper time]] of the particle,  the contravariant electromagnetic tensor
     

and is the covariant four-velocity of the particle, defined as: $$U\_\backslash beta\; =\; \backslash left(U\_0,\; U\_1,\; U\_2,\; U\_3\; \backslash right)\; =\; \backslash gamma\; \backslash left(c,\; -v\_x,\; -v\_y,\; -v\_z\; \backslash right)\; ,$$ in which $$\backslash gamma(v)=\backslash frac\{1\}\{\backslash sqrt\{1-\; \backslash frac\{v^2\}\{c^2\}\; \}\; \}=\backslash frac\{1\}\{\backslash sqrt\{1-\; \backslash frac\{v\_x^2\; +\; v\_y^2+\; v\_z^2\}\{c^2\}\; \}\; \}$$ is the Lorentz factor.

The fields are transformed to a frame moving with constant relative velocity by: $$F\text{'}^\{\backslash mu\; \backslash nu\}\; =\; \{\backslash Lambda^\{\backslash mu\}\; \}\_\{\backslash alpha\}\; \{\backslash Lambda^\{\backslash nu\}\; \}\_\{\backslash beta\}\; F^\{\backslash alpha\; \backslash beta\}\; \backslash ,\; ,$$ where is the Lorentz transformation tensor.

---

Translation to vector notation The component (-component) of the force is $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; p^1\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash tau\}\; =\; q\; U\_\backslash beta\; F^\{1\; \backslash beta\}\; =\; q\backslash left(U\_0\; F^\{10\}\; +\; U\_1\; F^\{11\}\; +\; U\_2\; F^\{12\}\; +\; U\_3\; F^\{13\}\; \backslash right)\; .$$

Substituting the components of the covariant electromagnetic tensor F yields $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; p^1\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash tau\}\; =\; q\; \backslash leftU\_0\; .$$

Using the components of covariant four-velocity yields $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; p^1\}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash tau\}\; =\; q\; \backslash gamma\; \backslash leftc\; =\; q\; \backslash gamma\; \backslash left(E\_x\; +\; v\_y\; B\_z\; -\; v\_z\; B\_y\; \backslash right)\; =\; q\; \backslash gamma\; \backslash left\; \backslash ,\; .$$

The calculation for (force components in the and directions) yields similar results, so collecting the three equations into one: $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash mathbf\{p\}\; \}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash tau\}\; =\; q\; \backslash gamma\backslash left(\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; \backslash right)\; ,$$ and since differentials in coordinate time and proper time are related by the Lorentz factor, $$dt=\backslash gamma(v)\; \backslash ,\; d\backslash tau,$$ so we arrive at $$\backslash frac\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; \backslash mathbf\{p\}\; \}\{\backslash mathrm\{d\}\; t\}\; =\; q\; \backslash left(\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash times\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; \backslash right)\; .$$

This is precisely the Lorentz force law, however, it is important to note that is the relativistic expression, $$\backslash mathbf\{p\}\; =\; \backslash gamma(v)\; m\_0\; \backslash mathbf\{v\}\; \backslash ,.$$

---

Lorentz force in spacetime algebra (STA) The electric and magnetic fields are dependent on the velocity of an observer, so the relativistic form of the Lorentz force law can best be exhibited starting from a coordinate-independent expression for the electromagnetic and magnetic fields $\backslash mathcal\{F\}$, and an arbitrary time-direction, $\backslash gamma\_0$. This can be settled through spacetime algebra (or the geometric algebra of spacetime), a type of Clifford algebra defined on a pseudo-Euclidean space, as $$\backslash mathbf\{E\}\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash mathcal\{F\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash gamma\_0\backslash right)\; \backslash gamma\_0$$ and $$i\backslash mathbf\{B\}\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash mathcal\{F\}\; \backslash wedge\; \backslash gamma\_0\backslash right)\; \backslash gamma\_0$$ $\backslash mathcal\; F$ is a spacetime bivector (an oriented plane segment, just like a vector is an oriented line segment), which has six degrees of freedom corresponding to boosts (rotations in spacetime planes) and rotations (rotations in space-space planes). The dot product with the vector $\backslash gamma\_0$ pulls a vector (in the space algebra) from the translational part, while the wedge-product creates a trivector (in the space algebra) who is dual to a vector which is the usual magnetic field vector. The relativistic velocity is given by the (time-like) changes in a time-position vector where $$v^2\; =\; 1,$$ (which shows our choice for the metric) and the velocity is $$\backslash mathbf\{v\}\; =\; cv\; \backslash wedge\; \backslash gamma\_0\; /\; (v\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash gamma\_0).$$

The proper form of the Lorentz force law ('invariant' is an inadequate term because no transformation has been defined) is simply

Note that the order is important because between a bivector and a vector the dot product is anti-symmetric. Upon a spacetime split like one can obtain the velocity, and fields as above yielding the usual expression.

---

Lorentz force in general relativity In the general theory of relativity the equation of motion for a particle with mass $m$ and charge $e$, moving in a space with metric tensor $g\_\{ab\}$ and electromagnetic field $F\_\{ab\}$, is given as

$$m\backslash frac\{du\_c\}\{ds\}\; -\; m\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{2\}\; g\_\{ab,c\}\; u^a\; u^b\; =\; e\; F\_\{cb\}u^b\; ,$$

where $u^a=\; dx^a/ds$ ($dx^a$ is taken along the trajectory), $g\_\{ab,c\}\; =\; \backslash partial\; g\_\{ab\}/\backslash partial\; x^c$, and $ds^2\; =\; g\_\{ab\}\; dx^a\; dx^b$.

The equation can also be written as

$$m\backslash frac\{du\_c\}\{ds\}-m\backslash Gamma\_\{abc\}u^a\; u^b\; =\; eF\_\{cb\}u^b\; ,$$

where $\backslash Gamma\_\{abc\}$ is the Christoffel symbol (of the torsion-free metric connection in general relativity), or as

$$m\backslash frac\{Du\_c\}\{ds\}\; =\; e\; F\_\{cb\}u^b\; ,$$

where $D$ is the covariant differential in general relativity.

---

Quantum mechanics In quantum mechanics, particles are described by Wave function whose evolution is governed by the Schrödinger equation. While this formulation does not involve Force explicitly, it extends the framework of Hamiltonian mechanics, by incorporating interactions with electromagnetic fields through potential terms in the Hamiltonian. For a non-relativistic particle of mass $m$and charge $q$, the Hamiltonian takes the form: $$\backslash hat\{H\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{2m\}\; \backslash left^2\; +\; q\backslash Phi(\backslash mathbf\{r\},\; t),$$ This expression is a direct generalization of the classical Hamiltonian that leads to the Lorentz force law. The key difference is that in quantum mechanics, position $\backslash mathbf\; r$ and momentum $\backslash hat\backslash mathbf\; p$ are operators that do not commute. As a result, quantum dynamics incorporate fundamentally different behavior such as wave interference and quantization. Unlike in classical physics, where only electric and magnetic fields influence particle motion, quantum mechanics allows the electromagnetic potentials themselves to produce observable effects. This is exemplified by the Aharonov–Bohm effect, in which a charged particle passes through a region with zero electric and magnetic fields but encircles a magnetic flux confined to an inaccessible area. Although the classical Lorentz force is zero along the particle's path, the interference pattern observed on a screen shifts depending on the enclosed magnetic flux, revealing the physical significance of the vector potential in quantum mechanics.

Nevertheless, the classical Lorentz force law emerges as an approximation to the quantum dynamics: according to the Ehrenfest theorem, the expectation value of the momentum operator evolves according to an equation that resembles the classical Lorentz force law. Even in the Aharonov–Bohm setup, the average motion of a wave packet follows the classical trajectory.

Quantum particles such as electrons also possess intrinsic spin, which introduces additional electromagnetic interactions beyond those described by the classical Lorentz force. In the non-relativistic limit, this is captured by the Pauli equation, which includes a spin–magnetic field coupling term: $$\backslash hat\{H\}\_\{\backslash text\{Pauli\}\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{2m\}\; \backslash left^2\; +\; q\backslash Phi\; +\; \backslash frac\{q\backslash hbar\}\{2m\}\; \backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash sigma\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash mathbf\{B\},$$ where $\backslash boldsymbol\{\backslash sigma\}$ are the Pauli matrices. This term leads to spin-dependent forces absent in the classical theory. A complete relativistic treatment is given by the Dirac equation, which incorporates spin and electromagnetic interactions through minimal coupling, and correctly predicts features such as the electron's gyromagnetic ratio.

---

Applications In many real-world applications, the Lorentz force is insufficient to accurately describe the collective behavior of charged particles, both in practice and on a fundamental level. Real systems involve many interacting particles that also generate their own fields and . To account for these collective effects—such as currents, flows, and plasmas—more complex equations are required, such as the Boltzmann equation, the Fokker–Planck equation or the Navier–Stokes equations. These models go beyond single-particle dynamics, incorporating particle interactions and self-consistent field generation, and are central to fields like magnetohydrodynamics, electrohydrodynamics, and plasma physics, as well as to the understanding of astrophysical and superconducting phenomena.

The Lorentz force occurs in many devices, including:

• and other circular path particle accelerators
• Mass spectrometers
• Lorentz force velocimetry

In its manifestation as the Laplace force on an electric current in a conductor, this force occurs in many devices, including:

• Magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters
• Electrical generators
• Homopolar generators
• Linear alternators

---

See also

• Hall effect
• Gravitomagnetism
• Formulation of Maxwell's equations in special relativity
• Moving magnet and conductor problem
• Abraham–Lorentz force
• Larmor formula
• Cyclotron radiation
• Magnetoresistance
• Scalar potential
• Helmholtz decomposition
• Field line
• Coulomb's law
• Electromagnetic buoyancy

---

Notes

---

Remarks

---

Citations

• Leslie E. Ballentine (1998). 9789810241056, World Scientific. ISBN 9789810241056
• Per F Dahl (1997). 9780429181924, CRC Press. . ISBN 9780429181924
• Olivier Darrigol (2025). 9780198505945, Clarendon Press. ISBN 9780198505945
• (2025). 9780805390476, Pearson / Addison-Wesley. . ISBN 9780805390476
• David J. Griffiths (2025). 9781009397735, Cambridge University Press. . ISBN 9781009397735
• Paul G. Huray (2025). 9780470542767, John Wiley & Sons. . ISBN 9780470542767
• John David Jackson (1998). 9780471309321, John Wiley & Sons. . ISBN 9780471309321
• Paul Nahin (2025). 9780801869099, Johns Hopkins University Press. . ISBN 9780801869099
• Edward M. Purcell (2025). 9781139012973, Cambridge University Press. . ISBN 9781139012973
• Matthew N. O. Sadiku (2025). 9780190698614, Oxford University Press. . ISBN 9780190698614
• J. J. Sakurai (2025). 9781108587280, Cambridge University Press. . ISBN 9781108587280
• (2025). 053440846X, Thomson Brooks/Cole. 053440846X
• Mark A. Srednicki (2025). 9780521864497, Cambridge University Press. . ISBN 9780521864497
• Andrew Zangwill (2025). 9780521896979, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521896979

---

External links

• target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> Lorentz force (demonstration)
• Interactive Java applet on the magnetic deflection of a particle beam in a homogeneous magnetic field by Wolfgang Bauer

Post Comment